CACC vs EG: fair value comparison
Credit Acceptance Corporation and Everest Group, Ltd. · Updated 2026-08-31
Both currently screen as undervalued on TickrTrends' Forward Fair Value model. Within Financial Services, CACC currently sits closer to the top of our discount ranking. EG carries the stronger quality grade.
| CACC | EG | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Undervalued | Undervalued |
| Last price | $572.97 | $377.61 |
| 12-month range | $419.60–$655.72 | $312.09–$374.15 |
| Sector rank | #37 of 165 Financial Services | #38 of 165 Financial Services |
| Quality grade | C- | C |
| Momentum grade | — | B |
| Leverage | High | Low |
| Margin trend | — | Contracting |
| Revenue growth | — | Strong |
| RSI zone | Neutral | Neutral |
| 50/200-day trend | Uptrend | — |
| DCF cross-check | — | Undervalued |
| 52-week position | The upper-middle quarter | The top quarter |
Full single-stock breakdowns: CACC fair value analysis · EG fair value analysis