COST vs MNST: fair value comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation · Updated 2026-09-06
Both currently screen as fairly valued on TickrTrends' Forward Fair Value model. Within Consumer Defensive, COST currently sits closer to the top of our discount ranking. MNST carries the stronger quality grade.
| COST | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Fairly valued | Fairly valued |
| Last price | $915.74 | $43.82 |
| 12-month range | $854.50–$1,011.70 | $44.99–$96.38 |
| Sector rank | #39 of 64 Consumer Defensive | #42 of 64 Consumer Defensive |
| Quality grade | C | A |
| Leverage | Low | — |
| Margin trend | Stable | Expanding |
| Revenue growth | Strong | Strong |
| RSI zone | Neutral | Neutral |
| 50/200-day trend | Downtrend | Mixed |
| DCF cross-check | Overvalued | Overvalued |
| 52-week position | The lower-middle quarter | The bottom quarter |
Full single-stock breakdowns: COST fair value analysis · MNST fair value analysis