GS vs MET: fair value comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and MetLife, Inc. · Updated 2026-08-31
Both currently screen as fairly valued on TickrTrends' Forward Fair Value model. Within Financial Services, GS currently sits closer to the top of our discount ranking. MET carries the stronger quality grade.
| GS | MET | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Fairly valued | Fairly valued |
| Last price | $1,033.99 | $96.51 |
| 12-month range | $730.85–$1,048.58 | $71.17–$96.13 |
| Sector rank | #68 of 165 Financial Services | #71 of 165 Financial Services |
| Quality grade | F | D |
| Momentum grade | — | A |
| Leverage | High | Moderate |
| Margin trend | Expanding | Expanding |
| Revenue growth | High | Declining |
| RSI zone | Neutral | Neutral |
| DCF cross-check | — | Undervalued |
| 52-week position | The top quarter | The top quarter |
Full single-stock breakdowns: GS fair value analysis · MET fair value analysis